We measure our material impacts using a mix of internal and external stakeholder engagement, together with consideration of:
- our operating context (e.g. current priorities within our business, or political or market forces which might be shaping our impacts)
- the sustainability context, including global best practice, significant reports on environmental impacts and societal expectations of responsible business conduct.
In 2024 we began alternating between what we call review years and reassessment years.
Review years involve an internal process which considers only those material impacts assessed and reported in the previous year. The focus is on reviewing and rescoring the significance of our existing impacts based on any changes in our operating or sustainability contexts. To do this we conduct a survey for each individual impact. These are completed by a range of internal subject matter, financial and risk experts.
We assess the significance of each impact by scoring its severity and likelihood. For severity, we consider the scale (how grave the impact is), scope (how widespread it is) and each impact’s irremediable character (how hard it is to put the harm right). Potential impacts are considered against the likelihood of the impact occurring. In addition, we consider the potential financial impact on Meridian over time.
Reassessment years involve the same internal process, together with external stakeholder engagement, through a specialist research agency, and consideration of new impacts. The latter involves reviewing risks captured in our risk management system, consultation with internal experts and external stakeholders, and a desktop study which explores changes in the global electricity industry and New Zealand business context. New impacts are then added to existing ones to be assessed, scored and ranked.