We measure our material impacts using a mix of internal and external stakeholder engagement, together with consideration of our operating context (e.g. current priorities within our business, or political or market forces which might be shaping our impacts).
In 2024 we began alternating between what we call review years and reassessment years.
Review years involve an internal process which considers only those material impacts reported in the previous year. The focus is on reviewing and rescoring these based on any changes in both our operating sustainability contexts, so we can update our list of material impacts and review progress on our mitigations and targets. This is particularly important where impacts are negative. To do this we use a series of surveys for each individual impact, completed by a range of internal subject matter, financial and risk experts.
We assess the significance of each impact by scoring its severity and likelihood. For severity, we consider the scale (how grave the impact is), scope (how widespread it is) and each impact’s irremediable character (how hard it is to put the harm right). Potential impacts are considered against the likelihood of the impact occurring. In addition, we consider the potential financial impact on Meridian over time.
Reassessment years involve the same internal process plus external stakeholder engagement. We also adopt a broader focus than in review years, considering impacts beyond those currently reported. We use a specialist agency to engage a representative sample of individuals to help us identify the impacts of most significance to external stakeholders, the effectiveness of our mitigation actions and how these might be improved.